Footpervert.com is not the primary producer of the content contained within the confines of this website and community.  Footpervert.com holds any and all Sponsors in good faith that they have conformed to 2257 laws within their applicable counrty, jurisdiction, country or nation.  With respect to all visual depictions displayed on this website, whether of actual sexually explicit conduct, simulated sexual content or otherwise, Our sponsors affirm and certify that all persons in said visual depictions were at least 18 years of age when said visual depictions were created.

The owners and operators of this Website may not be the primary producer (as that term is defined in 18 USC section 2257) of any of the visual content contained in the Website. Please direct questions pertaining to questionable content on this website to: christiaan@digitaldivasonline.com, and we will remove it immediately to continue to conform to the resived 2257 laws, policies and procedures.

In regards to December 18, 2008, when the Justice Department published “final” regulations concerning Section 2257 and related record keeping obligations.

(A)  only content which they produced on or after July 27, 2006, requires record keeping. When it first proposed the new amendments in July 2007, the Justice Department indicated that this would be its position, and it has reiterated this position in announcing the final regulations. This means that content secondarily produced between the 1988 enactment of Section 2257 and the above date is free from all secondary producer obligations.

(B)  As amended on July 27, 2006, Section 2257 now requires that secondary producers maintain records. However, the new regulations expressly authorize third party record keeping, so that a secondary producer may now use others to keep records. Nothing in the regulations prevents a secondary producer from using the primary producer as its third party record keeper or (in the regulations’ words) “non-employee custodian.” The Justice Department commentary accompanying the new regulations, but not the new regulations themselves, urge – and at some points contemplate – that secondary producers using third party record keepers use in good faith, copies of identifying documentation before republishing their material.  In accordance to this paragraph, Footpervert.com certifies that all Primary Producers have been examined.

(C)  We take any and all measures to ensure that the Primary Producers that we are displaying on this website are in accordance to all current 2257 record keeping and compliance statements and are operating in good taste of amended 2257 record keeping and compliance laws as they evolve.

(D)  Footpervert.com also excersises the right to "fair use", which states that as a merit of artistic value, it is permits limited use of copyrighted material without acquiring permission from the rights holders. Examples of fair use include commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching, library archiving and scholarship. It provides for the legal, unlicenced citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author's work under a four-factor balancing test. The term fair use originated in the United States. A similar principle, fair dealing, exists in some other common law jurisdictions. Civil law jurisdictions have other limitations and exceptions to copyright.

17 U.S.C. § 107
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 17 U.S.C. § 106 and 17 U.S.C. § 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:
1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
2. the nature of the copyrighted work;
3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.